Why Mark Zuckerberg ordered to remove tampons from men’s restrooms at Facebook parent Meta’s offices

Meta, the parent company of Facebook, Instagram, and Threads, has recently undertaken a series of sweeping changes to its policies and operations. These adjustments, which include decisions affecting diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives, content moderation practices, and facilities management, have sparked widespread discussion. According to reports from Fox News Digital and The New York Times, these changes appear to reflect Meta’s evolving stance on workplace policies and platform governance, prompting a mix of support, criticism, and employee dissatisfaction.

Why tampons are no longer in Meta’s men’s restrooms

One of the most visible policy shifts was the removal of tampons from men’s restrooms across Meta’s offices in Silicon Valley, Texas, and New York. This decision, reported by The New York Times, impacts nonbinary and transgender employees who may require such amenities. The company has not provided detailed explanations for this change, leaving room for speculation and concern among affected staff and advocates.

Meta has also revamped its approach to content moderation. In a move toward “restoring free expression,” the company ended its third-party fact-checking program in the United States. The program, which had been central to Meta’s efforts to combat misinformation, is being replaced by a “community notes” system similar to the model used by Elon Musk’s X (formerly Twitter). This crowdsourced moderation framework is intended to allow users to collaboratively add context to potentially misleading posts.

Critics argue that the elimination of fact-checking may leave the platform vulnerable to the unchecked spread of misinformation. However, Meta contends that the previous system had “gone too far” and impeded open discourse.

Meta ends DEI programs, shifting to merit-based hiring amid employee concerns

Meta has discontinued its primary DEI initiatives, a decision that Joel Kaplan, Meta’s Chief Global Affairs Officer, defended as a step toward merit-based hiring. Kaplan stated that recruitment would focus on individual qualifications rather than considerations of race or gender. While Meta frames this shift as a move to promote fairness and broaden candidate pools, internal communications reveal that LGBTQ staff members and other employees have expressed dissatisfaction, with some announcing their departure from the company.

The broader implications of this policy change extend beyond recruitment. Critics worry that the absence of structured DEI programs could lead to reduced support for underrepresented groups within Meta’s workforce.

Customization options and LGBTQ+ concerns

Another notable change involves the removal of transgender and nonbinary customization options from the Messenger application. This move has fueled concerns about Meta’s commitment to inclusivity. Internal reports indicate that LGBTQ+ employees feel alienated by these decisions, and many have raised questions about the company’s long-term priorities regarding diversity and inclusion.

Alignment with political shifts

These policy changes come amid what many observers see as a broader alignment with the political climate in the United States, particularly with the incoming administration of President-elect Donald Trump. Critics suggest that Meta’s decisions may reflect a strategic effort to gain favor with the administration by adopting positions that align with its ideological leanings. This perception is further reinforced by the company’s public emphasis on restoring “free expression” and its distancing from progressive DEI initiatives.

Employee reactions and public criticism

Internally, the response from Meta employees has been mixed. While some staff members view the changes as necessary to streamline operations and foster innovation, others feel disillusioned by what they see as a retreat from Meta’s prior commitments to inclusivity and progressive values.

Externally, Meta’s actions have drawn significant criticism from advocacy groups, public figures, and industry analysts. Some argue that these changes undermine the progress made in fostering a more equitable workplace and responsible content moderation practices.

Courtesy: Times Of India

Note: This news is originally published on timesofindia.indiatimes.com and is used purely for non-profit/non-commercial purposes, especially for human rights.