Gay couples petition India’s Supreme Court over same-sex marriage as Prime Minister Narendra Modi given deadline to respond

Four gay couples have asked India’s Supreme Court to recognise same-sex marriages, setting the stage for a legal face-off with Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government

Key points:

The four couples involved in the lawsuit want the Supreme Court to modify the law

Gay couples who hold commitment ceremonies are still unable to take out joint health or life insurance policies in India

A member of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s party told parliament same-sex marriage would cause “havoc”

In a historic verdict in 2018, India’s top court decriminalised homosexuality by scrapping a colonial-era ban on gay sex, but the government has in the past refused to legalise same-sex unions.

Despite the 2018 ruling, members of India’s lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) community complain about a lack of acceptance and discrimination against gay people in Indian society.

LGBT activists say that while the 2018 ruling affirmed their constitutional rights, they are still deprived of legal backing for same-sex marriages, a basic right enjoyed by heterosexual married couples.

In three Supreme Court filings seen by Reuters, the couples say that without legal recognition of being married, they are denied rights such as those linked to medical consent, pensions, adoption or even simpler things like club memberships for couples.

Lawyers and a court document confirm a fourth petition along similar lines has also been filed in the court.

A crowd of people carry giant transgender and LGBT pride flags over their heads.

“We can’t do so many things in the process of living together and building a life together,” says one of the litigants, businessman Uday Raj Anand, who wants to marry his partner Parth Mehrotra, chief editor of India’s Juggernaut Books.

Another couple, Supriyo Chakraborty and Abhay Dang, say in their submission that they held a two-day commitment ceremony last year like any other “Big Fat Indian wedding”.

But once the euphoria faded, they realised they could not take health insurance as couples or nominate each other in life insurance policies.

“In truth, they have no rights at all,” the filing states.

The four gay couples want a Supreme Court ruling that modifies or interprets laws in a way that allows same-gender marriages, the court filings show.

Decision to be a ‘landmark moment’

It is a sensitive subject in the socially conservative country of 1.4 billion people, where speaking openly about homosexuality is taboo for many.

The pleas have already triggered a debate on prime-time TV news and generated editorials in newspapers as to whether the time has come for the world’s largest democracy to join roughly three dozen countries where such marriages are legal.

Indian prince calls for reforms to anti-LGBT law

The world’s only openly gay royal, Indian prince Manvendra Singh Gohil, has made it his personal mission to campaign for reform of India’s anti-LGBT laws.

The United States this month approved legislation that provides federal recognition to same-sex marriages in a bid to further safeguard gay rights.

The Indian Supreme Court cases, which follow many lawsuits filed in lower courts where no decision was reached, will be a key test for Mr Modi’s Hindu nationalist government and his allies.

On Monday, a federal politician from Mr Modi’s party appealed to colleagues in the upper house of parliament to oppose legal recognition of marriage between same-sex couples.

“Same-sex marriage will cause havoc with the delicate balance of personal laws in the country […] two judges cannot take a decision on this social issue,” said Sushil Modi, a member of parliament from the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP).

“Parliament and society must debate it,” he said.

The law ministry has opposed same-sex marriages in the past and says courts should stay away from the law-making process that falls under parliament’s purview.

In one state court filing last year, the law ministry said a marriage depends on “age-old customs (and) rituals” and a sexual relationship between same-sex individuals is “not comparable with the Indian family unit concept of a husband, a wife and children”.

It added that in India marriage is “a solemn institution between a biological man and a biological woman”.

Three spokespersons for Mr Modi’s BJP, who declined to be named as the matter is before courts, say the party’s opposition to same-sex marriage remains the same as the government’s.

However they add the party will honour the top court’s verdict on the matter.

Mr Modi’s office and the federal law ministry did not respond to a request for comment whether there has been a change in their position on same-sex marriage.

Modi stands at a podium decorated with flowers and speaks with a hand raised in the air.

The Supreme Court has given the government until January 6 to submit its responses.

“With the top court taking up the case, the issue of marriage equality is likely to be decided at a hastened pace,” says Jayna Kothari, a gender-law expert who co-founded India’s Centre for Law & Policy Research.

“A decision on same-sex marriage in the near future is inevitable. That will be a landmark moment.”

Backing the couples are high-profile lawyers including one of India’s former Attorney-Generals and another counsel named Saurabh Kirpal, who is openly gay and in an interview last month accused Mr Modi’s government of delaying his elevation as a state judge due to his sexual orientation.

Mr Kirpal and Mr Modi’s office did not respond to a request for comment on those remarks.

Courtesy : ABC News

Note: This news piece was originally published in abcnews.com and used purely for non-profit/non-commercial purposes exclusively for Human Rights.